Racers round a corner while riding during an underground, nighttime bike criterium (a short, timed route – winner makes the most laps). Photo by David Rangel.
Racers round a corner while riding during an underground, nighttime bike criterium (a short, timed route – winner makes the most laps). Photo by David Rangel.
Robert Rivard

There is much more to making San Antonio a safe cycling city debate than getting riders to use bike helmets, although my June 10 article, “The Bike Helmet Dilemma: Freedom and Choice vs. Safety,” provoked strong responses from riders on both sides of the argument.

I doubt I changed any minds. Both camps, however, probably agree on other measures that can make San Antonio a safer place to cycle. There’s a good chance your city council representative and your county commissioner do not cycle or even own a bike, so get active if you want to see change. It won’t happen by itself. One good option is to join Bike Texas, the state’s leading non-profit cycling advocacy organization.

Safety in Numbers

The very visible growth in cycling is good for a lot of reasons, one of which is the safety of cyclists. The more people on bikes, the greater their visibility when cycling in urban traffic or on busy roadways. Motorists, meanwhile, are becoming more accustomed to sharing the road with cyclists as the biking community continues to grow. Okay, make that most motorists. Elected officials and law enforcement, who were slow to embrace the cycling movement, now are responding much more positively with public policy changes that favor cycling safety and growth.

Experienced cyclists who train and ride with a team, club or at casual meet-ups know that it feels much safer to be riding in a cohesive pack. Riding solo on streets without a defined bike lane makes a solitary rider feel more vulnerable to a speeding commuter or distracted driver working a cell phone.

The safest place to ride, of course, is where there aren’t any vehicles, such as the Mission Trail. But that’s very limited mileage, suitable for a recreational ride but not serious distance work.

Riding in groups, especially at night, also heightens visibility if every bike has front and back lights, required by state and local law.

Racers round a corner while riding during an underground, nighttime bike criterium (a short, timed route – winner makes the most laps). Photo by David Rangel.
Racers round a corner while riding during an underground, nighttime bike criterium (a short, timed route – winner makes the most laps). Photo by David Rangel.

Group riders can avoid antagonizing faster-moving vehicles by riding single file to allow vehicles to pass. I’ve seen cyclists refuse to yield in such circumstances, citing their own legal right to the road. Cyclists do have a right to be on the road, but state law includes this proviso: “Bicyclists may ride side by side so long as it does not prevent the reasonable flow of traffic.” The “share the road” campaign applies to everyone on the road, motorists and cyclists alike. Attention, slow pokes: If cyclists are moving at a speed below the speed limit, they are required to yield to vehicle traffic. Yielding is also good PR for building better motorist-cyclist détente.

Cyclists know that motorists are hyper-sensitive to cyclists drifting through an empty intersection, or pausing at a stop sign when there is no traffic. The same vehicle drivers, of course, routinely exceed speed limits, make turns without using their turn signals, and change lanes on streets and expressways without warning. If every cyclist on the road consciously broke traffic laws they still couldn’t come even close to the number of laws being broken at the same time by motorists, but that doesn’t alter the dynamic. Cyclists who disobey traffic laws in front of motorists inflame the issue.

Ask the Boss to Start a Company B-cycle Program

The Pearl Brewery's B-cycle station. Photo by Tom Trevino.
The Pearl Brewery’s B-cycle station. Photo by Tom Trevino.

San Antonio employers of all sizes can adopt a practice taking root in other cities with bike share programs by offering workers free or subsidized annual memberships to B-cycle. The cost is minimal, and the payoff is happier workers getting more exercise and leaving their cars parked when they go to lunch or commute to and from work.

Corporate bike share programs also helps build bike mass on urban core streets, reducing traffic and emissions. The City of San Antonio has offered employee discounts on memberships, which are $60 a year for an adult and $48 for students and seniors. Now in its third year, B-cycle has grown to a network of 42 stations with 355 bikes. By the end of summer there will be 50 stations with 450 bikes.

Lower Speed Limits

Nothing has more of a positive impact on safe cycling than slowing down vehicles.

“If a cyclist gets hit by an automobile going 40 mph you’re probably a fatality, with or without a bike helmet,” said Robin Stallings, executive director of Bike Texas. “At 30 mph, wearing a helmet, you’ll survive. At 20 mph, cars have time to stop and accidents don’t happen or happen a lot less often. Slow down cars and you’ll have a lot fewer fatalities.”

Monica Caban and Julian Castro
Mayor Julián Castro (center) and Police Chief William McManus (right) appear at a press conference for Monica Caban, an injured cyclist whose accident helped spur the safe passage ordinance and SAPD sting program. Photo by Iris Dimmick

Educating motorists is essential, beginning when teenagers earn their driver’s license and later, along roadways wherever motorized vehicles and cyclists meet. Cyclists have the same legal right to the roadway as motorists.

The City of San Antonio’s Office of Sustainability is running an outreach campaign called, “There’s Enough Road to Go Around” (see video below). The department also maintains a Facebook page, San Antonio Bikes, that offers education and safety resources and links, including programs for parents who want to teach their children safe cycling.

YouTube video

“Lower speed limits definitely enhance safety for vulnerable road users, but it’s a balancing act to make sure that all forms of traffic have an acceptable ‘level of service’,” said Julia Murphy, who manages the San Antonio Bikes program for the City. “It has to be a street by street consideration looking at the purpose of the thoroughfare and surrounding land uses, for example.”

Cyclists can do their part by riding in the right lane of a two-lane roadway in a manner that does not antagonize drivers by preventing them from safely passing. Riding in the left lane, weaving through lanes, running red lights and stop signs, all serve to alienate vehicle operators, especially those who don’t recognize a cyclist’s legal right to the road.

Drivers who express their anger by rapidly accelerating by cyclists, blasting their horns, or brushing back cyclists should know that sort of road rage is illegal. Undercover bike cops do move around the city at times to ensure motorists stay at least three feet away from cyclists at all times.

Here is a video on driver education and motorist-bicyclist safety posted on the www.bicyclinginfo.org website: A video can be viewed here.

Bike Lanes Done Right

This Mulberry Avenue bike lane is too narrow to offer cyclists a safe space from passing vehicles. Photo courtesy of COSA/Office of Sustainability
This Mulberry Avenue bike lane is too narrow to offer cyclists a safe space from passing vehicles. Photo courtesy of COSA/Office of Sustainability

Separating vehicles and cyclists wherever possible also makes sense.

San Antonio has increased the miles of bike lanes in the city, going from 34 miles in 2000 to 242 in 2012, and 100 miles of trail and creekside riding, with more planned.

The October 2012 presentation to the Bicycle Mobility Advisory Committee by the San Antonio-Bexar County Metropolitan Planning Organization offers a good briefing on the city’s cycling infrastructure and what lies ahead in the way of improvements. For bike lanes to succeed, however, three elements are necessary:

  • Continuity. Bike lanes that are only a few blocks in length and then disappear confuse motorists and cyclists. One minute you have separation from vehicle traffic, the next minute you are impeding traffic. San Antonio has very few complete streets that recognize the rights of cyclists, runners and pedestrians.
  • Signage. Prominent signage reminds drivers to share the road. It would be nice to see signage promoting the “three-foot rule.” Well-marked bike lanes with stenciled cycling silhouettes on the roadway also would help.
  • Parking. Bike lanes aren’t really bike lanes if they are too narrow to be functional, or if it’s legal for motorists to park in them. Vehicles parked in a bike lane force cyclists back into traffic, which often provokes angry reactions from motorists. Anytime a motorist loses his or her temper over a cyclist, the danger quotient rises significantly. Smart cyclists choose flight over fight.

Cyclists familiar with the pedestrian sidewalk improvements in Southtown along S. Alamo and S. Presa Streets know to avoid  these awkward sidewalk extensions and planters. The extensions add a bit of green to the streetscape, but their placement alongside the sidewalk, rather than next to vehicle traffic where they could serve as a buffer, eliminates any possibility of a secure bike lane.

This South Alamo Street landscaping amenity actually inhibits safe cycling. A smaller planter separating vehicle traffic from a secure bike lane would be better. Photo by Robert Rivard
This South Alamo Street landscaping amenity actually inhibits safe cycling. A smaller planter separating vehicle traffic from a secure bike lane would be better. Photo by Robert Rivard

Cycle Tracks

San Antonio has recently added a few European-style “cycle tracks,” which provide a visible buffer between cyclists and vehicle traffic, such as a parking lane, a curb, or even better, trees or plant boxes. I’ve cycled in rush hour cycling traffic in Denmark, where thousands of commuters, far outnumbering vehicle traffic, move along cycle tracks that are completely separated by landscaping and sound barriers.

“That’s one of the reasons they don’t worry as much about helmet use in Europe,” Stallings said. “Over there they have so much separation between cyclists and riders it’s just less of an issue. For San Antonio to be competitive in the long run it makes sense for the city to add more cycle tracks.”

Cyclists who ride around the Pearl or Brackenridge Park will be familiar with the modest cycle tracks found there.  City officials hope to add a cycle track to Cesar Chavez Boulevard, and others on Market and South Alamo streets as part of the Hemisfair Park redevelopment.

The tracks can pose their own set of challenges. It can be confusing for motorist and cyclist at intersections who has the right of way.  Cycle tracks than run alongside parked vehicles limit visibility of moving traffic as you near an intersection. The few cycle tracks in San Antonio are short and end abruptly.

The author, Express-News reporter Colin McDonald and Richard Varn, a former city official on a cycle track next to Brackenridge Golf Course. Photo courtesy of COSA/Office of Sustainability
The author, Express-News reporter Colin McDonald and Richard Varn, a former city official on a cycle track next to Brackenridge Golf Course. Photo courtesy of COSA/Office of Sustainability

Be Safe, Be Bright

State law and local ordinance require cyclists to obey traffic laws.

Cyclists on the street between dusk and dawn are required to have a white light mounted on the front of their bike visible for 500 feet, and a red rear light visible for the same distance.  Many cyclists wear brightly colored jerseys, and some affix blinking red lights to the back of their jerseys, backpacks or helmets to heighten vehicle awareness. The City’s Office of Sustainability has distributed more than  5,000 sets of bike lights in recent years to help cyclists light it up from dusk to dawn.

The City’s San Antonio Bikes page offers cyclists and motorists an up-to-date guide to current laws and ordinances. We’d all be safer if everyone would learn the rules of the road and abide by them.

Follow Robert Rivard on Twitter @rivardreport or on Facebook.

Related Stories:

Hell Yes and Hell No to Bike Helmets

The Bike Helmet Dilemma: Freedom and Choice vs. Safety

SicloVerde: Riding Bikes, Visiting Gardens For a Cause

Building a Bicycle-Friendly San Antonio, One Committee Meeting at a Time

Share the Road: SAPD Launches New Program to Catch Unsafe Drivers

The Feed: National Bike Month Rides into San Antonio, Just in Time

The Feed: B–Roll on the Mission Reach

The Feed: Show Down + Síclovía = Fit City, USA

The Feed: Get Outside the Box for an Outdoor Workout

 

Robert Rivard, co-founder of the San Antonio Report who retired in 2022, has been a working journalist for 46 years. He is the host of the bigcitysmalltown podcast.

6 replies on “San Antonio’s Drive Toward Safe Cycling”

  1. Thanks for posting this. My husband rides his bike to work and that has made me a lot more aware of cyclists, and of course, more worried for his safety! We can all do better to make sure we get to where we need to be in a safe way, whether in a car or on a bike.

  2. I vote Hilldibrand gets a nice bike lane! They already crunch it into a quasi one lane anyway from shook to McCollough. They should make a bike lane from Broadway to McCollough, that would be awesome and some good hills for “pros”.

    Also OP Park out Bandera is a great place to ride.

    I didn’t know you had written an article about bike helmets, that’s cool! I am a helmet fan, the people who don’t want to wear them is fine with me, it is natural selection at it’s finest. That said I think some great PSA’s about helmets could go a long way. I know I could be in it, as one time I didn’t wear my BMX helmet on my bike when I was a kid and suffered a concussion when I flipped it over…

    Accidents are not planned, they can only be prepared for…

    As for riding on the road, it is a mixed bag, I wouldn’t trust San Antonian’s very much in terms of stopping for ya or giving ya the 3ft needed. But as you said, if we could get some PSA’s going and bring awareness it would help.

    Good Article!

  3. A lot of people don’t ride bikes because it not safe to ride in traffic with cars. I rode motorcycles for years, they can keep up with cars and much quicker than bicycles, but still not safe. Look at the news, it seems motorcyclist die everyday in crashes with cars. One thing that bicycles can do that motorcycles can’t is ride in separated protected bike lanes. Protected bike lanes need to be pushed and pushed again to governments, other wise your just taking your chances with cars just like motocycles do. To think other wise shows your in denial. The Dutch seem to understand this, it took 40 years of pushing their government to get to where they are now. They were pioneers, but I think we can do it faster by the examples they set.
    PS. Those cars that park next to cycle tracks add a added layer of protection for the cyclist.

  4. I support bicycling in San Antonio! I would like to see more separated cycle tracks and protected bike lanes in town. This will help encourage people of all ages to bike

  5. A standard width lane is 11-12ft wide and too narrow for a bicycle and a motor vehicle to share side by side, which is why a cyclist can use the entire lane. A lane must be at least 14ft wide to be considered shareable and so the two abreast rule ONLY applies to lanes at least 14ft wide, Texas Transportation Code Section 551.103 Motor vehicles need to change lanes to pass safely in a standard lane, which is why the San Antonio Safe Passing Ordinance instructs drivers to vacate the lane when possible.
    The Austin PD has an excellent video on driving around cyclists http://youtu.be/aUtFluEODC0
    Riding in door zone bike lanes like the one on Grayson by the Pearl are far more dangerous than riding out in the lane. Doorings can be fatal.

  6. Offering comments to planning organizations and public officials is a vital part of improving bicycle / pedestrian facilities in SATX.

    TxDOT and the Alamo RMA are making plans to turn US-281 north of Loop 1604 into a controlled-access expressway. Right now is your chance to weigh in on these changes and make sure the plans include space for bikes and pedestrians!

    Unfortunately, time and time again it seems projects may include “potential” bicycle accommodation, but fail to include “actual” bicycle accommodation throughout the design and construction of the project. Voters must speak up about the importance of bicycle accommodation along this corridor and participate in planning process to make these potential multi-use paths become a reality.

    PLEASE comment about this project by sending an email to the address below BEFORE JULY 1, 2013 – Submit your comments via email to S281EIS@AlamoRMA.org.

Comments are closed.