Texas Gov. Greg Abbott on Tuesday laid out a largely expected agenda for the 85th legislative session while declaring four issues as emergencies for lawmakers to take up immediately: banning so-called “sanctuary cities,” overhauling the state’s broken child welfare system, implementing ethics reform, and approving a resolution to support a convention of states to amend the U.S. Constitution.
In his State of the State address, Abbott said Texas remained “exceptional” and expressed optimism the state’s economy would bounce back from an oil downturn. At the top of his priority list for lawmakers was the child welfare system, which a federal judge declared broken in 2015 and lawmakers have since been scrambling to overhaul.
“Do not underfund this rickety system only to have it come back and haunt you,” Abbott told lawmakers in a joint session of the Texas House and Senate. “If you do nothing else this session, cast a vote to save the life of a child.”
Beyond emergency items, Abbott announced Tuesday he was directing state agencies to impose a hiring freeze as a way of dealing with the state’s tight budget. He said the move would free up about $200 million in the current budget.
Abbott had sharp words for lawmakers on the pre-K program that he championed last session. He said he was “absolutely perplexed” by the insufficient attention given to it by the budget proposals both chambers unveiled earlier this month.
“They nod in the direction of pre-K, but they turn a blind eye to the goal of achieving high-quality pre-K,” Abbott told lawmakers. “If you’re going to do this, do it right or don’t do it at all.”
Abbott did not mention what could end up being the most controversial legislation of the session: the so-called “bathroom bill” being pushed by Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick. The legislation would restrict people to use public bathrooms that correspond with their “biological sex,” and Abbott has taken a largely neutral stance on it so far.
Abbott also made little mention of President Donald Trump, though he announced he will meet Tuesday with Trump’s Homeland Security secretary, John Kelly, in the Rio Grande Valley. While the state’s Republicans are hopeful Trump will provide relief to their long-running border security efforts, Abbott indicated his budget will maintain the $800 million in additional funding for the issue that lawmakers approved last session.
“Texans will not flinch in our resolve to keep Texans safe,” Abbott said.
Abbott earned perhaps the loudest applause when he said this session will be the one in which lawmakers ban sanctuary cities, or places where local officials do not fully cooperate with federal immigration authorities. Abbott has been locked in a standoff with Travis County Sheriff Sally Hernandez over the issue, though he did not mention her in the speech.
On ethics reform, Abbott applauded lawmakers for crafting legislation this session that avoids “the pitfalls that led to the demise” of it in 2015. Ethics reform was also among his emergency items that year.
And on the convention of states, Abbott made clear the election of President Donald Trump, a fellow Republican, does not change the need to repair the Constitution.
“It must be fixed by the people themselves,” Abbott said.
Beyond his four emergency items, Abbott touched on a litany of issues that have already sparked spirited debate under the pink dome. Among them is education, an issue where the two chambers have prioritized different approaches.
“Both the House and the Senate are right to tackle the vexing issue of school finance now rather than putting it off,” Abbott said, while also nodding to a Patrick priority that has gotten a chilly reception in the House. “Let’s make Texas the 31st” state that offers school choice, Abbott added, pitching a program that would let parents use public money to send their children to private schools.
Abbott repeatedly acknowledged that lawmakers have less money to work with this session than they did in 2015. Yet he expressed little concern about the squeeze’s ultimate effect, especially with his new hiring freeze in effect.
“I am confident we are going to be able to balance the budget without looting the Rainy Day Fund,” Abbott said, referring to the state’s politically touchy savings account. Largely fed by taxes on oil and gas development, the fund is the fund is projected to have a balance of $11.9 billion at the end of the next two-year budget if lawmakers don’t tap it this session. Some House leaders have suggested using the fund this session to address some key funding concerns.
Despite the tight fiscal picture, Abbott continued to push for tax relief, emphasizing his desire to see further cuts to the business franchise tax. Ideally, Abbott said, the tax will be trimmed “until we can fit it in a coffin.”
Abbott also pushed for “serious property tax reform with a real revenue cap,” describing a proposal by State Sen. Paul Bettencourt (R-Houston) as “on the right track.” Bettencourt’s bill would further restrict local officials’ ability to raise property taxes without voter approval.
Read more:
- In his first State of the State address two years ago, Gov. Greg Abbot laid out an ambitious agenda, including an expansion of pre-kindergarten, massive tax cuts and roads as far as the traffic-glazed eye can see.

The thought of what Abbott & Co. would want to do to US Constitution is terrifying. What does he have in mind? I know he and his cronies dream of weaving “religious freedom” in areas where it does not belong. They’d love declaring an “official” religio (One guess which one it is….). Does he pine to eliminate marriage equality? Dissolve Roe v. Wade?
And it is time for Abbott to stop being “neutral” about his Henchman Number Uno Dan Patrick’s ridiculously sad fixation on transgender people using the bathroom. Dan has refused to meet with a Houston parent of a trans kid. She invited him to dinner to see what a family with a transgender kid is like (Spoiler Alert: A family with a trans kid is just like any other family). If Abbott cares about our kids, as he claims he does, why doesn’t he care about our trans kids equally?
Prove me I’m wrong, but I can’t help thinking that Abbott and Patrick are very, very confused about what a transgender person is. Dan thinks a trans woman is “a man in a dress” trying to pull off some funny business in the ladies’ room.
Dear Reader: If you aren’t sure what a transgender person is, please take a few minutes and google the subject. You will see that transgender men look just like…like…like… MEN! They live their lives like…like…like…MEN! And surely we all agree that a “man” is a term for a wide range of appearance and behavior. Trans men are part of the continuum and they just wanna use the bathroom, wash their hands and get on with their lives. Dan, however, wants trans men (many of whom are muscular, hairy, bearded GUYS) to use the same public restroom his wife uses. REALLY, Dan? Those trans guys do not want to use the women’s room and the gals in that women’s room don’t want them there either. But YOU do! Your heinous SB2 will REQUIRE big butch hairy trans men to use the women’s room because their birth certificates say “Female.”
Bring on the ethics reform….and if anyone is unethical, it is our Lt. Gov.
I enjoyed the article on Gov. Abbott’s State of the State address. However, I could find nowhere in it an explanation for why the governor wants to convene a convention of states and what repairs he believes are needed in the U.S. Constitution. This is a glaring omission that I hope will be explained in future articles.
He’s been asking for a convention of states for awhile now. I don’t think it’s anything new. IIRC, NPR’s The Source talk about it last year once. Doesn’t mean we ignore it though.
Thank you for your response, Andrew. However, in my experience in writing for publications, it’s journalism 101 that writers don’t presume that their readers know the background of the topic written about. It’s better to give at least a brief explanation so that everyone understands. If you’re going to assume, it’s better to assume that at least some of your audience needs an explanation.