The Historic and Design Review Commission considered several large projects on Wednesday, but the 210 Development Group’s plan to build a 240-unit apartment complex right behind Mission Concepción was not one of them.
“We’re doing some additional plan studies and documentation that the Commission requested,” said Michael Wibracht, president of the local development firm.
The delay has nothing to do with recent complaints about the proposed buildings’ height exceeding City-designated thresholds for structures built near the four Spanish colonial-era Missions in the Southside, he said. 210 Development withdrew the project from Wednesday’s agenda and will likely come back before HDRC for final approval in August.
(Read more: Apartments at Mission Concepción Could Violate Height Restrictions)
Nonetheless, several representatives from Native American tribes were allowed to speak during the meeting to express their extreme opposition to the project.
The speakers included Maria Torres, tribal chairwoman for the Pacuache Indian Tribe First Nation of Texas, and five others that are becoming familiar faces to City officials and developers of projects proposed and completed on “sacred, ancestral land,” Torres said, like those near Alamo Plaza, the other four Missions, Hemisfair Park, and beyond.
The apartment complex, so-called Villa Concepción, “is a huge encroachment to the universal value” of the mission, she said. Preserving the historical and cultural context is critical if the City wants to keep the Missions’ World Heritage designation from UNESCO. She suggested that the City impose eminent domain to seize land around the Missions for protection from development. It’s an idea that has not gained much traction locally and strongly contradicts the general preference for property owners rights in Texas, but the City has used eminent domain before. The neighborhood that HemisFair ’68 was built on is one prominent example.
Other concerned citizens and groups, including the Alliance for San Antonio Missions, have called for the City to use money from the 2017 Municipal Bond to purchase the land. The Alliance is not opposed to all development near the Missions, representatives have said, but they’d rather see “smart” development that preserves locals’ and visitors’ experiences of the historic structures.
Because of the neighborhood’s adamant support of the apartment complex at Concepción, however, the Alliance softened its stance on the matter. That is, until it came to light that some of the buildings will be higher than the Mission Protection Overlay District allows. Some portions will be visible from the grounds of the Mission and that “sets a bad precedence,” Alliance spokesperson Carroll Brown told the Rivard Report Tuesday.
Top image: View of Mission Concepción from a drone looking east. Photo by Scott Ball.
Related Stories:
Apartments at Mission Concepción Could Violate Height Restrictions
History, Culture, Celebration to Collide at Inaugural World Heritage Festival
Mission San José Neighbors: Apartments Too Close For Comfort
Thank you. Native Americans, as well as the Alliance for San Antonio Missions are Correct! A MORATORIUM within the 1500 ft. Buffer is urgently needed. The 2 Degree Angle from a “BRASS BUTTON” was “RIGGED”. ITs time to hit the reset buttion. 2% should immediately bee reduced to 1% if not eliminated completely. Both OHP and Councilwoman D3 are grossly negligent. OHP, once again, has failed the Citizens of San Antonio while favoring developers and Special/Political Interests The Archdiocese’s plan to prostitute a World Heritage site in exchange for rental income is an insult! This detrimentally damages, diminishes and destroys historic/natural resources and privatizes World Heritage and cultural resources (as well as UNIVERSAL VALUES), that should be for the enjoyment of all. National Park Service Directors who are running intereference for their Archdiocese partners are also negligent. Furthermore, it appears the Archdiocese is in VIOLATION of Federal Section 106 Law, as they, as well as their Foundation to preserve this heritage have received Federal Funds. They should be ashamed!! Again, thanks to the Rivard Report for reporting on the big picture/ big preservation opportunity.
Also, we understand that 50% of the Roosevelt Association Directors, as well as a MAJORITY !! of the Rossevelt Neighborhood residents, who deserve the last word on this matter, are opposed!