Regino Soriano is one of the plaintiffs in a case challenging San Antonio's food truck laws. Image courtesy of Institute for Justice.
Regino Soriano is one of the plaintiffs in a case challenging San Antonio's food truck laws. Image courtesy of Institute for Justice.

Steaming mad at an ordinance targeting their business, four food truck vendors are hauling the city of San Antonio to court.

Facing $2,000-a-day fines for operating within 300 feet of a restaurant, the food truckers say the local restrictions are unconstitutional.

“San Antonio should be encouraging small-business owners like us, not trying to hurt our food truck businesses by playing favorites,” said Tacos el Regio owner Ricardo Quintanilla, one of the plaintiffs.

He is joined by Rafael Lopez of El Bandera Jalisco, Regino Soriano of El Bandolero, and Bernardo Soriano of El Bandolero II in a case challenging San Antonio’s food truck laws.

To operate legally, food vendors must get permission from any restaurant within 300 feet. If a restaurant opens within that zone, the truckers must move on.

The vendors’ lawsuit, filed Tuesday in Bexar County District Court, follows a successful challenge to a similar law in El Paso.

San Antonio’s ordinance applies to food trucks on private property that they own or lease, as well as to those using public parking spaces.

See the video below by the Institute for Justice that features the vendors involved in the lawsuit and explains their side of the suit and how the City cracks down on downtown food trucks:

“No one should need their competitors’ permission to run a business,” said Institute for Justice attorney Arif Panju, lead counsel for the food truck operators. “We wouldn’t expect a mom-and-pop hardware store to get permission from Home Depot to open down the street, and, for the same reason, we shouldn’t expect food truck owners to have to get permission from restaurants.

“The 300-foot rule does nothing to help consumers. It is used to help restaurants eliminate their food-truck competition,” Panju said.

Seeking a permanent injunction against the city, the IJ complaint cites the Texas Constitution’s “substantive due course of law” guarantee, which Panju describes as “the right to earn an honest living in the occupation of one’s choice free from unreasonable governmental interference.”

Jeff Coyle, San Antonio’s director of government and public affairs, said in a statement:

“The city has a long-standing policy of regulating the mobile food industry. The codes reflect a balance of interests between various sectors of the food industry and the public in an effort to maintain cooperation and communication, as well as to provide a safe environment for mobile food sales.”

Jon Lindskog, vice president of the San Antonio Food Truck Association, said, “None of our members have had a problem with the ordinance.”

“Enforcement only happens if someone complains, and not many restaurants have complained,” he told Watchdog.org. “The city isn’t driving around looking for violators.”

Lindskog, who owns a restaurant and two food trucks, said the association is taking no position on the lawsuit.

“No one in our association has been cited, and no one has been shut down. There’s enough business for everybody,” he said.

This story has been republished with permission from the Texas bureau of Watchdog.org

*Top image: Regino Soriano is one of the plaintiffs in a case challenging San Antonio’s food truck laws. Image courtesy of Institute for Justice.

Related Stories:

Food Truckers to Converge in SA for ROAM Mobile Food Conference

A Night With Ana and Jenn Working at the Institute of Chili Food Truck

Truckin’ Tomato: Bringing the Farmer’s Market to You

Joan Cheever May File Lawsuit Against City

Kenric Ward

Kenric Ward is a veteran journalist who has worked on three Pulitzer Prize-winning newspapers. A California native, he received a BA from UCLA (Political Science/Phi Beta Kappa) and holds an MBA. He reported...